An exploration of patients’ experience of nurses’ use of point-of-care information technology in acute care

The rapid introduction of technology into acute healthcare settings, specifically the presence of point-of-care health information technology at patients’ bedsides, is expected to impact patients’ healthcare experience by altering nurse-patient interactions. This research was a multi-method naturalistic pilot study designed to explore patients’ perception of their interactions with nurses using bedside point-of-care health information technology in acute care. Data were collected using observation, interviews and surveys. Twenty-four participants were purposefully recruited from medical and surgical wards, to capture variability in their self-reported confidence with information technology; 29% were not confident, 38% were somewhat confident and 33% were completely confident with information technology. Participants’ mean age was 68.6 years (SD 11.1) and 63% were male. Qualitative observation, interview and survey data showed some nurses directly involved patients and explained or demonstrated how the point-of-care health information technology was being used to complement and enhance their care; while others used the point-of-care health information technology as an electronic documentation tool without engaging their patients. Patients’ experiences of point-of-care health information technology differed with their self-reported confidence with information technology; those with complete information technology confidence were better at recognising the potential and opportunities for point-of-care health information technology to support self-directed care than those with less confidence using information technology. Some participants reported that the use of point-of-care health information technology impeded interpersonal communication with nurses. Participants recognised the benefits of point-of-care health information technology to support clinical practice but generally desired greater engagement with the nurses when they used the system

MyStay – Development of nurse-facilitated condition-specific multimedia resources to facilitate patient participation in postoperative care

Improved postoperative outcomes and the global drive toward the provision of patient-centred care underpins efforts to enhance the nature and capacity of patient participation in acute postoperative hospital care. In this paper, we describe the design, framework and processes used to develop a modular, procedure-specific, digital health intervention platform aimed at improving the patient experience and patient participation in care following surgery. The intervention, a multimedia application MyStay, uses bedside delivery of audio-visual and text-based information to engage postoperative patients to better participate in their care. MyStay modules are developed using an iterative, multi-method approach intended to balance procedure-specific best evidence, current clinical practice, and patient preferences. Development involves six key elements: (1) Empathise with target users, (2) Ground in evidence and behavioural theory, (3) Specify target behaviours, (4) Integration of health service standards and clinical care pathways/guidelines, (5) Build and refine the multimedia product and, (6) Pilot implementation to assess potential effectiveness and usability. To-date, we have developed four procedure-specific MyStay modules and an additional three are under development. Initial patient usage data for the Total Knee Replacement (TKR) and cardiac surgery applications indicated that users accessed a wide range of text-based and audio-visual information, most frequently recovery goals and exercises following TKR, and postoperative recovery information for the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. As previous research that tested MyStay indicated its efficacy in optimising clinical postoperative outcomes, this framework may be useful in the development of other digital health innovations. Further research is required to assess patient and clinician engagement and determine whether MyStay is associated with improved patient outcomes across varied clinical contexts. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Innovation & Technology lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework (https://www.theberylinstitute.org/ExperienceFramework). Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this len

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Effectiveness of strategies to increase uptake of pertussis vaccination by new parents and family caregivers : a systematic review

Objectives: Cocoon immunisation strategies involve administration of Bordetella pertussis containing vaccines to parents and family members who are in close contact with newborns. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to increase uptake of vaccination against Bordetella pertussis infection by parents and family caregivers of newborn children (< 3 months of age). Design: A protocol driven systematic review was conducted between 2005 and February 2020. CINAHL, Medline, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Setting: Inpatient maternity care units, ante-natal and post-natal clinics based in acute care or primary/community care contexts. Participants: (i) mothers, (ii) fathers and (iii) family caregivers or other regular household contacts of infants < 3 months of age. Interventions: Health promotion interventions and immunisation clinics designed to promote “cocoon immunisation” against Bordetella pertussis infections of the newborn. Measurements: Change in uptake of adult vaccination with a pertussis containing vaccine (dTpa or Tdap) by new parents and family caregivers. Findings: Eight studies were included in this review. Strategies used to promote vaccination included: written and verbal education, promotional videos, provision of vaccine prescriptions and financial incentives, opportunistic vaccination of family members and population-based health promotional messaging. Six of the eight studies reported positive impacts on vaccination uptake. Four studies evaluating providing opportunistic immunisation during the obstetric admission reported statistically significant increases in maternal (+39% to +57%), paternal (+21% to +52%) and household members (+32%) vaccination rates. Targeted public health campaigns were also found to increase vaccination uptake but in isolation were insufficient to achieve vaccination of all household contacts. Conclusion: Promotion of pertussis vaccination to new parents and the provision of opportunistic vaccination during the obstetric admission or post-natal visit, was the most successful strategy to increase uptake of pertussis vaccination by family caregivers